Paediatric head injury — MRCEM SBA MCQ
Instant feedback + full explanation. One question, done properly.
Educational content. Not a substitute for clinical judgement or local policy.
Reveal the answer and explanation
Correct answer: A — Arrange a CT head scan within 1 hour.
Three discrete vomiting episodes constitute one of NICE’s specified risk factors for children under 16 with a head injury. In the absence of a second risk factor or an immediate-imaging criterion, the initial decision to observe him for at least 4 hours from the injury was appropriate. The fourth episode occurs during that observation period. NICE specifies that further vomiting during observation triggers a CT head scan within 1 hour, even if the child remains alert with a GCS of 15. ([nice.org.uk](https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/NG232/chapter/recommendations)) B applies when observation proceeds without further vomiting, reduced GCS or abnormal drowsiness; it is no longer appropriate. C incorrectly restarts an observation clock when further vomiting instead calls for imaging. D delays CT beyond the indicated 1-hour interval. E substitutes admission for the indicated scan; admission and subsequent disposition can be considered after imaging and reassessment. The fall is below NICE’s specified height for a dangerous mechanism in a child, and there are no other features in the stem that independently require immediate CT. ([nice.org.uk](https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/NG232/chapter/recommendations))
Reference: NICE NG232, Head injury: assessment and early management, recommendations 1.5.10–1.5.12 (18 May 2023) — https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/NG232/chapter/recommendations NICE NG232, head injury imaging algorithm for people under 16 (18 May 2023) — https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng232/resources/imaging-algorithm-pdf-13061125549