Traumatic haemorrhagic shock with hyperfibrinolysis — MRCEM SBA MCQ
Instant feedback + full explanation. One question, done properly.
Educational content. Not a substitute for clinical judgement or local policy.
Reveal the answer and explanation
Correct answer: E — Give tranexamic acid while proceeding to laparotomy.
This patient has ongoing major traumatic haemorrhage and has not responded to blood-component resuscitation. He needs immediate operative haemorrhage control; tranexamic acid is an adjunct, not a reason to delay laparotomy. NICE advises against intravenous tranexamic acid more than 3 hours after major trauma **unless there is evidence of hyperfibrinolysis**. His viscoelastic result supplies that exception, so giving it now while proceeding to surgery is the best answer. ([nice.org.uk](https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng39/chapter/Recommendations)) A applies the usual 3-hour restriction but overlooks its explicit exception. B is tempting because laboratory results guide subsequent blood-component treatment, but standard coagulation tests need not precede treatment when hyperfibrinolysis is already demonstrated. C reverses the sequence: definitive haemorrhage control is urgent, yet tranexamic acid need not wait for it. D might be reasonable if the initial result were unreliable or inconsistent with the clinical picture; neither concern is given here. Continuing blood-component resuscitation and moving promptly to haemorrhage control remain essential regardless of the tranexamic acid decision. ([nice.org.uk](https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng39/chapter/Recommendations))
Reference: NICE NG39: Major trauma: assessment and initial management, recommendations 1.5.4–1.5.5 (17 February 2016) — https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng39/chapter/Recommendations NICE NG39: Major trauma: assessment and initial management, recommendations 1.5.27 and 1.5.29 (17 February 2016) — https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng39/chapter/Recommendations