skip to main content

Recurrent haemorrhagic corpus-luteum cysts during warfarin therapy — DFSRH MCQ

Instant feedback + full explanation. One question, done properly.

HardAnticoagulationRecurrent haemorrhagic corpus-luteum cysts during warfarin therapyDFSRH

A 34-year-old woman with a mechanical mitral valve takes warfarin, with a target INR of 2.5–3.5. During the past year she has required two emergency admissions for haemoperitoneum caused by ruptured corpus-luteum cysts. Pelvic imaging between episodes is normal, and the gynaecology team considers recurrent ovulatory bleeding exacerbated by anticoagulation to be the cause. She wants highly effective reversible contraception that is also likely to suppress ovulation. She does not want an intrauterine method or a daily pill and accepts the possibility of delayed return to fertility. She has no osteoporosis risk factors. It is day 3 of a normal menstrual period, pregnancy has been excluded, and her INR today is 3.0. Which is the most appropriate contraceptive plan?

Educational content. Not a substitute for clinical judgement or local policy.

Reveal the answer and explanation

Correct answer: EInitiate subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate 104 mg every 13 weeks without interrupting warfarin

Explanation lettering: E = shown as A · C = shown as B · D = shown as C · B = shown as D · A = shown as E

Subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-SC) is the best fit because this patient requires both effective contraception and sustained suppression of ovulation to reduce further corpus-luteum formation and anticoagulation-exacerbated haemoperitoneum. DMPA acts primarily by inhibiting ovulation and commonly produces reduced bleeding or amenorrhoea. Progestogen-only methods are acceptable in complicated valvular disease, whereas combined hormonal contraception is UKMEC 4. FSRH advises that anticoagulation need not be altered for injectable contraception when the INR is therapeutic; DMPA-SC avoids a deep intramuscular injection, although its bleeding advantage is not proven. B uses an ovulation-suppressing method, but interrupting warfarin in a patient with a mechanical mitral valve creates avoidable thrombotic risk and is not required for contraceptive injection. C is highly effective and may inhibit ovulation, but ovarian activity is not completely suppressed and enlarged follicles can still occur. D can reduce anticoagulant-associated heavy menstrual bleeding, but its contraceptive action is predominantly local and ovulatory cycles usually continue; she also declines intrauterine contraception. E would suppress ovulation and permit continuous use, but estrogen-containing contraception is contraindicated in complicated valvular disease despite concurrent anticoagulation.

Reference: FSRH Contraceptive Choices for Women with Cardiac Disease (June 2014) — https://www.fsrh.org/Common/Uploaded%20files/documents/ceuguidancecontraceptivechoiceswomencardiacdisease.pdf FSRH Progestogen-only Injectable Contraception (December 2014; amended July 2023) — https://www.fsrh.org/Common/Uploaded%20files/documents/progestogen-only-injectable-december-2014-amended-11july2023.pdf UK Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use (2016; amended September 2019) — https://www.fsrh.org/Common/Uploaded%20files/documents/fsrh-ukmec-full-book-2019.pdf