Postmenopausal osteoporosis — SCE Rheumatology MCQ
Instant feedback + full explanation. One question, done properly.
Educational content. Not a substitute for clinical judgement or local policy.
Reveal the answer and explanation
Correct answer: D — Continue alendronic acid with periodic reassessment
Explanation lettering: E = shown as A · C = shown as B · D = shown as C · A = shown as D · B = shown as E
Bisphosphonate therapy should be reviewed after 5 years of oral treatment, but an improved T-score does not by itself mandate a treatment pause. NICE identifies age over 75 years as a factor favouring continuation because fracture risk remains high. This woman is 77, tolerates alendronic acid, adheres correctly and has no treatment complication; continuing it with periodic evaluation, potentially up to 10 years in total, is therefore appropriate. B would be appropriate after 5 years for a person without specified high-risk features whose T-score had improved above −2.5; her age is the decisive discriminator against a pause. C is unnecessary because denosumab is generally used when bisphosphonates are unsuitable or another clinical indication supports changing treatment. It would also create a requirement for uninterrupted dosing and planned antiresorptive therapy when eventually discontinued. D offers no advantage because oral treatment is tolerated and adherence is reliable; intravenous zoledronic acid is useful when oral administration is unsuitable or impractical. E is less appropriate because raloxifene primarily reduces vertebral fractures and is generally reserved for postmenopausal women in whom other treatments are contraindicated or unsuitable. Continued treatment should still undergo periodic clinical review rather than being regarded as an automatic indefinite prescription.
Reference: Osteoporosis QS149: Quality statement 4 — Long-term follow-up (Published 28 April 2017; checked 19 August 2026) — https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/qs149/chapter/quality-statement-4-long-term-follow-up