Crowned dens syndrome (axial calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease) — SCE Rheumatology MCQ
Instant feedback + full explanation. One question, done properly.
Educational content. Not a substitute for clinical judgement or local policy.
Reveal the answer and explanation
Correct answer: C — Conventional CT of C1–C2
The acute inflammatory neck syndrome, previous attacks compatible with acute CPP crystal arthritis and meniscal chondrocalcinosis together suggest crowned dens syndrome. Conventional CT focused on C1–C2 is the preferred imaging modality because it demonstrates the characteristic peri-odontoid calcification within the transverse and alar ligament region. Plain radiography may show peripheral chondrocalcinosis but is insensitive for peri-odontoid deposits because of overlapping anatomy. Ultrasound is recommended alongside radiography for peripheral CPPD, but the deep craniovertebral junction lacks a suitable acoustic window. Contrast-enhanced MRI can demonstrate adjacent inflammation and is important when discitis, epidural infection, cord compression or another soft-tissue process is suspected; however, it is less sensitive than CT for the defining calcification. Dual-energy CT is established principally for identifying monosodium urate deposition in gout. Its diagnostic role in CPPD is less established and it is not preferred over conventional CT for crowned dens syndrome. Thus, the axial location changes the imaging pathway from peripheral radiography or ultrasound to conventional CT.
Reference: 2023 EULAR recommendations on imaging in diagnosis and management of crystal-induced arthropathies in clinical practice (15 May 2024) — https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38320811/