Non-visible haematuria with dysuria — MSRA MCQ
Instant feedback + full explanation. One question, done properly.
Educational content. Not a substitute for clinical judgement or local policy.
Reveal the answer and explanation
Correct answer: B — Refer using a suspected cancer pathway for assessment of bladder cancer
This man requires referral on a suspected cancer pathway for bladder cancer. NICE NG12 recommends this for people aged 60 years or over with unexplained non-visible haematuria and either dysuria or a raised white cell count. He meets the age criterion and has dysuria; a raised white cell count is not additionally required. Repeated negative cultures, absence of transient precipitants and microscopy-confirmed haematuria make urinary infection or sample contamination less likely explanations. Apixaban can precipitate bleeding, but anticoagulant treatment does not exclude an underlying urinary tract lesion and should not be used as a reason to defer haematuria investigation. Empirical antibiotics are inappropriate with repeatedly negative cultures and no supportive urinalysis features. Routine urology referral under-triages a patient who meets NG12 suspected cancer criteria. Nephrology assessment would be more appropriate if there were evidence suggesting medical renal disease, such as significant albuminuria/proteinuria, impaired renal function, hypertension or an active urinary sediment; these are absent here.
Reference: NICE NG12: Suspected cancer: recognition and referral — Bladder cancer, recommendation 1.6.4 (Last updated 15 April 2026) — https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng12/chapter/Recommendations-organised-by-site-of-cancer NHS Borders: Referral guideline for investigation of haematuria in adults in primary care (2026) — https://rightdecisions.scot.nhs.uk/media/1704/haeumaturia-in-adults.pdf