Non-visible haematuria with raised white cell count — MSRA MCQ
Instant feedback + full explanation. One question, done properly.
Educational content. Not a substitute for clinical judgement or local policy.
Reveal the answer and explanation
Correct answer: C — Refer using a suspected cancer pathway for bladder cancer
Explanation lettering: C = shown as B · B = shown as C
This man should be referred using a suspected cancer pathway for bladder cancer. NICE NG12 recommends this for people aged 60 years and over with unexplained non-visible haematuria plus either dysuria or a raised white cell count. He is 64 years old, has non-visible haematuria without evidence of infection, and has persistent leukocytosis. Normal ACR and preserved eGFR make a primary glomerular cause less likely and do not alter the cancer-referral criterion. A is attractive because non-visible haematuria is often rechecked, but NICE does not require repeated dipsticks before referral when the age and raised-white-cell-count criterion is met. C underestimates the required urgency. D may form part of subsequent specialist assessment but should not delay the suspected cancer pathway referral. E is inappropriate because he has no urinary symptoms, pyuria, nitrites or significant growth on culture to support UTI.
Reference: NICE NG12: Suspected cancer: recognition and referral, section 1.6.4 Bladder cancer (Updated 15 April 2026) — https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng12/chapter/recommendations-organised-by-site-of-cancer