Acute lateral foot injury with suspected fifth-metatarsal fracture — MSRA MCQ
Instant feedback + full explanation. One question, done properly.
Educational content. Not a substitute for clinical judgement or local policy.
Reveal the answer and explanation
Correct answer: C — Arrange plain radiographs of the foot
This patient meets the Ottawa foot-rule criteria for foot radiography: she has pain in the midfoot region with focal bony tenderness at the base of the fifth metatarsal. Her ability to bear weight does not negate this indication, because either relevant bony tenderness or inability to bear weight triggers imaging in the appropriate anatomical zone. She does not meet the ankle-rule criteria: there is no posterior malleolar edge or tip tenderness and she can walk 4 steps. Therefore, ankle radiographs are not indicated solely because the injury mechanism also commonly produces a lateral ligament sprain. Imaging both regions would add unnecessary ankle films. Treating without imaging would be appropriate only if the foot rule were negative, for example if tenderness were confined to the anterior talofibular ligament without fifth-metatarsal or navicular bony tenderness and she could weight-bear. Ultrasound is not the first-line test for excluding an acute fifth-metatarsal fracture in this presentation.
Reference: NICE NG38: Fractures (non-complex): assessment and management — recommendations (2016) — https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng38/chapter/recommendations Evaluation of the Ottawa clinical decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle and midfoot injuries in the emergency department: an independent site assessment (1994) — https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7912053/