skip to main content

Montelukast neuropsychiatric warning — GPhC CRA MCQ

Instant feedback + full explanation. One question, done properly.

HardRespiratory TherapeuticsMontelukast neuropsychiatric warningGPhC CRA

A patient receiving verapamil develops malignant hyperthermia during surgery and the team prepares intravenous dantrolene. Which interaction warning requires immediate pharmacist intervention?

Educational content. Not a substitute for clinical judgement or local policy.

Reveal the answer and explanation

Correct answer: DAvoid intravenous dantrolene with verapamil because serious cardiovascular collapse has been reported

Explanation lettering: B = shown as A · E = shown as B · A = shown as C · C = shown as E

A invents increased renal elimination and an unsupported dose reduction. B is wrong because the clinically dangerous signal specifically concerns intravenous dantrolene with calcium-channel blockers. C invents antagonism of dantrolene’s mechanism and substitutes an inappropriate treatment. D is correct: product information recommends avoiding intravenous dantrolene with verapamil or diltiazem because cardiovascular collapse has occurred, including fatal ventricular fibrillation in supporting evidence. E is wrong because spacing does not remove the pharmacodynamic interaction.

Reference: Dantrium IV 20 mg SmPC. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc/product/1097/smpc