Radiation-induced Second Cancer — SCE Medical Oncology MCQ
Instant feedback + full explanation. One question, done properly.
Educational content. Not a substitute for clinical judgement or local policy.
Reveal the answer and explanation
Correct answer: B — The combined features support a radiation-associated second primary; retrieve the old plan before specialist treatment planning
Explanation lettering: B = shown as A · D = shown as B · E = shown as C · C = shown as D · A = shown as E
D is correct. A radiation-associated solid tumour is a clinicopathological attribution supported by occurrence within a previously irradiated field after an appropriate latency and histological distinction from the original cancer. No single feature proves causation. Prior plans and dose-volume data matter because tissue tolerance, fibrosis, wound healing and any re-irradiation strategy affect feasibility. A wrongly treats a distinct sarcoma as recurrence. B skips pathological confirmation and overstates field location. C discards clinically important previous exposure. E again treats one criterion as proof and ignores the planning consequences of irradiated tissue.
Reference: Radiation-induced secondary malignancies review: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29983028/