Composite Endpoints — SCE Medical Oncology MCQ
Instant feedback + full explanation. One question, done properly.
Educational content. Not a substitute for clinical judgement or local policy.
Reveal the answer and explanation
Correct answer: E — Composite endpoints increase event rates (improving statistical power and feasibility) but may dilute clinically meaningful signals if components have different importance — interpretation requires understanding which component events drive the result
Composite endpoints (EFS, DFS, IDFS) combine multiple event types to increase event rates, enabling smaller trials or shorter follow-up to reach statistical significance. However, not all components may be equally clinically relevant (e.g. contralateral breast cancer or second primary may be less treatment-related than ipsilateral recurrence). Trial reporting should present: overall composite result, individual component event rates, and sensitivity analyses excluding less relevant components. The STEEP criteria standardise endpoint definitions in early breast cancer trials.
Reference: JRCPTB Curriculum; STEEP criteria Hudis et al JCO 2007; FDA Endpoints Guidance