Intraosseous Haemangioma Risk — MFDS Part 1 MCQ
Instant feedback + full explanation. One question, done properly.
Educational content. Not a substitute for clinical judgement or local policy.
Reveal the answer and explanation
Correct answer: D — Defer invasive treatment and arrange urgent maxillofacial assessment with vascular imaging
The correct answer is D. Spontaneous gingival bleeding, unexplained mobility of a vital tooth and a trabeculated intraosseous lesion should raise concern for a vascular lesion. Extraction or biopsy can disrupt abnormal vessels and precipitate massive, potentially fatal haemorrhage. Invasive treatment should therefore be deferred pending urgent specialist assessment, vascular imaging and planned vascular control. Incisional biopsy is unsafe before the vascular nature and flow characteristics are assessed. Routine socket haemostatic measures may be inadequate following extraction. Root canal treatment is not justified because the tooth is vital and the findings are not characteristic of apical inflammatory disease. Antibiotics do not treat a vascular lesion and would delay definitive investigation.
Reference: Debnath et al. Pediatric Intraosseous Cavernous Hemangioma of the Mandible: A Case Series Highlighting Diagnostic Challenges and Surgical Management. 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42359181/