skip to main content

Mepivacaine Plain Indications — MFDS Part 1 MCQ

Instant feedback + full explanation. One question, done properly.

ModeratePharmacologyMepivacaine Plain IndicationsMFDS Part 1

Which clinical situation most strongly favours using 3% mepivacaine plain rather than a dental local anaesthetic containing adrenaline?

Educational content. Not a substitute for clinical judgement or local policy.

Reveal the answer and explanation

Correct answer: CA brief restorative procedure when avoiding an adrenaline-containing cartridge is clinically appropriate

Explanation lettering: D = shown as A · E = shown as B · A = shown as C · C = shown as D · B = shown as E

A is correct. In dental practice, a plain local anaesthetic has a shorter duration of action than a preparation containing a vasoconstrictor. Therefore, 3% mepivacaine plain is a reasonable choice for a brief procedure when use of an adrenaline-containing cartridge is clinically inappropriate or best avoided. Adrenaline improves anaesthetic depth and duration, so B, C and D favour an adrenaline-containing preparation rather than mepivacaine plain. Adrenaline also reduces local bleeding through vasoconstriction; therefore, E is not an indication for a plain preparation. The choice should still be individualised: many potential adrenaline interactions can be managed by limiting the dose rather than automatically avoiding adrenaline.

Reference: NHS Specialist Pharmacy Service. Considering interactions with local anaesthetics in dentistry, section "Dental LA cartridges", updated 6 January 2025. https://sps.nhs.uk/articles/considering-interactions-with-local-anaesthetics-in-dentistry/