skip to main content

Sweet Syndrome — SCE Dermatology MCQ

Instant feedback + full explanation. One question, done properly.

HardConnective Tissue & VasculitisSweet SyndromeSCE Dermatology

A 60-year-old man presents with a tender expanding erythematous plaque on his shin with a blistering centre. His bloods show markedly elevated neutrophils. He has a history of myelodysplastic syndrome. Biopsy shows dense dermal neutrophilic infiltrate without infection. He does not have underlying IBD. What targeted therapy has shown benefit for recalcitrant neutrophilic dermatoses?

Educational content. Not a substitute for clinical judgement or local policy.

Reveal the answer and explanation

Correct answer: EAnti-IL-1 (Anakinra/Canakinumab)

The correct answer is E, Anti-IL-1 (Anakinra/Canakinumab). This man has a classic presentation of Sweet syndrome (acute febrile neutrophilic dermatosis): a tender, rapidly expanding erythematous plaque with pseudovesiculation on the shin, neutrophilia, and a dense dermal neutrophilic infiltrate on biopsy without infection. The strong association with myelodysplastic syndrome points to malignancy-associated (paraneoplastic) neutrophilic dermatosis, a group increasingly recognised as IL-1 driven autoinflammatory disease. IL-1 (both alpha and beta) is a key upstream cytokine amplifying neutrophil recruitment and activation in Sweet syndrome and pyoderma gangrenosum, so blocking IL-1 with anakinra (IL-1 receptor antagonist) or canakinumab (anti-IL-1beta monoclonal) directly targets this pathway and has been used successfully in corticosteroid-refractory or recalcitrant disease. Why the other options are wrong: A. Anti-CD20 (Rituximab): targets B lymphocytes and is used in antibody-mediated disease (e.g. certain autoimmune blistering disorders); neutrophilic dermatoses are not B-cell or antibody driven, so B-cell depletion has no established mechanistic rationale here. C. Anti-IL-5 (Mepolizumab): IL-5 governs eosinophil maturation and survival, relevant to eosinophilic conditions such as severe eosinophilic asthma or hypereosinophilic syndrome, not neutrophil-driven dermatoses. D. Anti-IL-4R (Dupilumab): blocks IL-4/IL-13 signalling central to Th2 allergic and atopic disease (atopic dermatitis, asthma); it has no role in neutrophil-mediated autoinflammation. B. Anti-IgE (Omalizumab): targets IgE-mediated mast cell degranulation in allergic disease (urticaria, allergic asthma), which is pathogenically unrelated to a sterile neutrophilic infiltrate. Key point: In recalcitrant or malignancy-associated neutrophilic dermatoses (Sweet syndrome, pyoderma gangrenosum), IL-1 blockade with anakinra or canakinumab targets the core autoinflammatory driver when corticosteroids fail or are contraindicated.

Reference: O'Connor C, Gallagher C, Hollywood A, Paul L, O'Connell M. Anakinra for recalcitrant pyoderma gangrenosum. Clinical and Experimental Dermatology (British Association of Dermatologists journal), 2021;46(8):1558-1560. https://doi.org/10.1111/ced.14809