Nail Psoriasis Biologic Access — SCE Dermatology MCQ
Instant feedback + full explanation. One question, done properly.
Educational content. Not a substitute for clinical judgement or local policy.
Reveal the answer and explanation
Correct answer: C — Yes — nails are a recognised high-impact site; significant nail disease with high functional/QOL impact can justify biologic access even with low PASI under BAD guidelines
BAD guidelines recognise nail psoriasis as a high-impact manifestation that can justify biologic therapy even when PASI is <10. Significant nail disease causes: pain (subungual hyperkeratosis/onycholysis causing pressure), functional impairment (difficulty with fine motor tasks, footwear problems), cosmetic distress, and psychosocial impact. The decision to escalate to biologic therapy is based on the combination of nail severity (NAPSI), functional impairment, QOL impact (DLQI), and failure of other treatments. IL-17 inhibitors (Ixekizumab) have shown the highest nail clearance rates. The slow response timeline of nail psoriasis (6-12 months) should be communicated.
Reference: BAD 2020 Biologic Guidelines; NICE