DAS28 Limitations in PsA — SCE Rheumatology MCQ
Instant feedback + full explanation. One question, done properly.
Educational content. Not a substitute for clinical judgement or local policy.
Reveal the answer and explanation
Correct answer: A — DAS28 may underestimate activity because the ankle and dactylitis are not captured; a PsA-specific assessment should be used
DAS28 may substantially underestimate this patient's PsA activity. Its 28-joint count includes the knee but excludes the ankle, feet and distal interphalangeal joints, and it does not directly assess dactylitis, enthesitis, psoriasis or axial disease. A low DAS28 therefore cannot establish low overall PsA activity when clinically active domains lie outside the score. A PsA-specific approach should be used: DAPSA assesses peripheral arthritis using broader joint counts, while MDA or PASDAS incorporate additional disease domains; separate domain assessment remains necessary. Option D is anatomically incorrect. Normal inflammatory markers would not correct the omitted domains, so B is false. DAS28 is neither expected to overestimate activity nor preferred specifically for oligoarticular PsA, excluding A and E.
Reference: Mulder MLM et al. Measuring disease activity in psoriatic arthritis: PASDAS implementation in a tightly monitored cohort reveals residual disease burden. Rheumatology. 2021;60:3165-3175. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33331947/