GCA Normal Inflammatory Markers — SCE Rheumatology MCQ
Instant feedback + full explanation. One question, done properly.
Educational content. Not a substitute for clinical judgement or local policy.
Reveal the answer and explanation
Correct answer: B — Untreated cranial GCA remains possible; about 4% of biopsy-proven cases have normal inflammatory markers
Explanation lettering: E = shown as A · C = shown as B · D = shown as C · B = shown as D · A = shown as E
GCA remains a clinical possibility despite concordantly normal ESR and CRP. Approximately 4% of biopsy-proven cases have normal inflammatory markers at diagnosis, and contemporary biopsy-verified data give a similar estimate of 3.5%. This patient has several high-risk cranial features—new temporal headache, jaw claudication, an abnormal temporal artery and diplopia—so normal blood tests must not override the pre-test probability. She requires immediate high-dose glucocorticoid treatment, same-day assessment because of diplopia, and urgent confirmatory vascular ultrasound and/or temporal artery biopsy without delaying treatment. Neither ESR nor CRP is sufficiently sensitive to exclude GCA, so A and B are incorrect. Normal-marker disease does not require constitutional or large-vessel manifestations, excluding D. Diagnostic imaging and biopsy can confirm GCA without subsequent marker elevation, excluding E.
Reference: Mills-Baker F, Bakht T, Nugaliyadde A, Paul A. Easily Missed? Giant cell arteritis. BMJ 2026;392:e086139. Published 29 January 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37024620/