Psoriatic Arthritis — SCE Rheumatology MCQ
Instant feedback + full explanation. One question, done properly.
Educational content. Not a substitute for clinical judgement or local policy.
Reveal the answer and explanation
Correct answer: B — None; escalate to a biologic or targeted synthetic DMARD
Explanation lettering: B = shown as A · D = shown as B · E = shown as C · C = shown as D · A = shown as E
D is correct. Conventional synthetic DMARDs have no demonstrated efficacy for axial inflammation in psoriatic arthritis or axial spondyloarthritis. UK (BSR) domain-based guidance directs that active axial disease failing two NSAIDs is escalated to a TNF inhibitor or IL-17 inhibitor, with a JAK inhibitor as an alternative. Methotrexate and leflunomide are reasonable for peripheral arthritis, and methotrexate also benefits skin disease, but this patient has isolated axial disease, so neither is indicated here. Sulfasalazine has modest effect on peripheral arthritis only; its historical use in sacroiliitis is not supported by outcome data. Hydroxychloroquine is not a PsA axial therapy and may aggravate psoriasis. The absence of peripheral, entheseal and significant skin involvement removes any other domain-based reason for a csDMARD.
Reference: Zhao SS et al. The 2025 British Society for Rheumatology guideline for the treatment of axial spondyloarthritis with biologic and targeted synthetic DMARDs, Rheumatology (Oxford) 2025 (escalation after NSAID failure; csDMARDs not recommended for axial disease): https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12107049/