Journal

What does most used actually measure? Verified users, active users, questions answered, consultations supported and institutional access are different things. iatroX, OpenEvidence,...

Independently reproducing the core Epic use case without any real patient data: eleven synthetic record flaws, six clinical questions, nine scoring dimensions, and the proposal for...

The true strategic ambition behind this announcement appears broader than clinical search: a governed environment spanning clinical work, research, operations, business and softwar...

PubMed is a literature database. Clinical decision support requires an additional layer that selects, grades, synthesises and contextualises the literature. Five stages, one clinic...

OpenAI and OpenEvidence are converging from opposite directions inside the same EHR: one starting as a broad enterprise workspace adding patient context, the other starting as a cl...

ClinicalKey AI, Dyna AI, UpToDate Expert AI, OpenEvidence and ChatGPT for Clinicians compared by jurisdiction: a powerful global evidence tool is not automatically the right tool f...

The published protocol for a transparent, repeatable benchmark of AI prescribing-information tools: 100 to 150 fictional questions, ten scoring domains, blinded expert review, and ...

A real citation can sit under a wrong answer: five citation failures, the 2026 evidence that even the best AI drug-information tools score below pharmacists, and the verification s...

Early preclinical to finals, the stack changes because the problem changes: comprehension, transfer, clinical evidence, then exam calibration; small deliberate stacks by year, with...

The honest time equation is answer time minus verification time, and unverified answers are borrowed time with interest; the five-minute student workflow that keeps AI a net saving...

Clinical evidence search and structured learning solve different problems; where OpenEvidence genuinely helps a student on rotation, what it does not provide for exams, and the loo...

Yes, internet point-of-care learning is a recognised CME format in the US, but AMA PRA Category 1 Credit only flows through accredited providers; here is how the pathway actually w...