The Bottom Line
- “CESR/CEGPR” is now framed as the “Portfolio Pathway” — it’s still evidence-based equivalence to the UK CCT curriculum, assessed against specialty guidance.
- Expect a large, structured bundle: 800–1000 pages of mapped evidence is common; organisation and indexing often matter as much as raw volume.
- The winning move is an evidence factory: a single master index, tight mapping to Specialty Specific Guidance (SSG), and relentless “missing-evidence” closure.
What it actually is (in one line)
You are proving — on documents alone — that you already function at the level of a UK-trained specialist/GP, by mapping your entire practice to the CCT curriculum using the GMC’s Specialty Specific Guidance (SSG).
The most expensive mistake: “uncurated dumping”
Uploading too much irrelevant evidence can be as damaging as uploading too little. Your evidence should read like a structured argument: each item exists to prove a specific curriculum requirement — nothing more.