Displaced midshaft clavicle fracture with skin tenting/ischaemia — MSRA MCQ
Instant feedback + full explanation. One question, done properly.
Educational content. Not a substitute for clinical judgement or local policy.
Reveal the answer and explanation
Correct answer: E — Contact the on-call orthopaedic team and arrange same-day emergency-department assessment with the arm supported in a sling
Explanation lettering: E = shown as A · A = shown as C · C = shown as E
This is skin tenting with evolving skin ischaemia over a displaced clavicle fracture. The decisive feature is not the degree of shortening or comminution, but the tightly stretched, pale, poorly blanching skin over the fracture fragment. This represents threatened skin viability and requires acute orthopaedic assessment, despite an intact distal neurovascular examination. The arm should remain supported and the patient should be sent to the emergency department after direct orthopaedic contact. A is inappropriate because routine virtual follow-up applies to uncomplicated fractures; skin compromise is an exception. B is insufficient because repeat imaging and a next-day clinic review delay specialist assessment of threatened soft tissue. D wrongly waits for conversion to an open fracture or neurovascular deterioration. E overstates the immediate risk: there is no evidence of haemodynamic instability, vascular compromise, respiratory compromise or mediastinal injury requiring emergency ambulance transfer. Marked displacement alone may justify fracture-clinic consideration in an adolescent, but skin tenting/ischaemia changes both the priority and referral route.
Reference: Emergency Department Medical Guidelines: Clavicle Fracture Guidelines (Implemented August 2023; section reviewed April 2023) — https://www.sheffieldchildrens.nhs.uk/download/1721/acute-injury-and-orthopaedics/64209/4-15-clavicle-fracture.pdf