skip to main content

CPG4 locally advanced non-metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma — MSRA MCQ

Instant feedback + full explanation. One question, done properly.

HardProstate CancerCPG4 locally advanced non-metastatic prostate adenocarcinomaMSRA

A 67-year-old man has newly diagnosed prostate adenocarcinoma. Multiparametric MRI demonstrates extracapsular extension consistent with cT3a disease; there is no seminal-vesicle invasion. Targeted biopsy shows Gleason score 4+3=7 (grade group 3) disease. PSA is 18 micrograms/L. CT and isotope bone scan show no nodal or distant metastases. He is fit for curative treatment and, after counselling, chooses radical external beam radiotherapy rather than prostatectomy. Using the Roach formula, his estimated risk of pelvic lymph-node involvement is 22%. What is the most appropriate MDT treatment recommendation?

Educational content. Not a substitute for clinical judgement or local policy.

Reveal the answer and explanation

Correct answer: EHypofractionated radical external beam radiotherapy with 6 months of androgen-deprivation therapy; consider pelvic radiotherapy and continuing androgen-deprivation therapy for up to 3 years.

Explanation lettering: E = shown as A · C = shown as B · B = shown as C · A = shown as E

This is cT3a disease, so he is CPG4 despite PSA below 20 micrograms/L and Gleason 4+3=7. He has non-metastatic, locally advanced disease that remains suitable for curative treatment. As he has selected external beam radiotherapy, NICE recommends radical radiotherapy combined with androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT), with 6 months of ADT offered before, during or after radiotherapy. In CPG4 disease, the MDT should also discuss the benefits and harms of continuing ADT for up to 3 years rather than treating prolonged ADT as mandatory. His Roach nodal-risk estimate exceeds 15%, so pelvic radiotherapy should be considered in the setting of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy and radical radiotherapy. It is not automatically required. B misses both the CPG4-specific discussion about prolonged ADT and the indication to consider pelvic treatment. C incorrectly makes 3 years of ADT obligatory and disregards the nodal-risk calculation. D is inappropriate because brachytherapy alone should not be used for CPG4 disease. E abandons a potentially curative combined-modality strategy in a fit man with non-metastatic disease.

Reference: NICE NG131: Prostate cancer: diagnosis and management, Recommendations (Last updated 15 December 2021; checked 16 August 2026) — https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng131/chapter/Recommendations