Acute urinary retention secondary to bladder outlet obstruction — MSRA MCQ
Instant feedback + full explanation. One question, done properly.
Educational content. Not a substitute for clinical judgement or local policy.
Reveal the answer and explanation
Correct answer: C — Insert a urethral catheter and start tamsulosin before a planned trial without catheter
Explanation lettering: D = shown as C · E = shown as D · C = shown as E
This is acute urinary retention: painful inability to void, a palpable bladder and an 850 mL residual volume require immediate bladder drainage. The likely precipitant is chlorphenamine, whose anticholinergic effect may worsen pre-existing bladder outlet obstruction from benign prostatic enlargement, but withdrawing it does not remove the need for urgent catheterisation. NICE recommends immediate catheterisation for acute retention and an alpha blocker before catheter removal. Tamsulosin is therefore appropriate while the catheter is in situ, to improve the likelihood of a successful trial without catheter. There is no stated contraindication to alpha blockade in this case. A is incomplete because catheterisation alone omits the recommended alpha blocker before trial without catheter. B delays decompression of symptomatic acute retention. C is inappropriate for the immediate phase: finasteride may be relevant later for progression risk in men with an enlarged prostate, but its onset is too slow to facilitate trial without catheter. E incorrectly prioritises surgery over immediate decompression; surgery may be considered subsequently if retention recurs or medical management fails.
Reference: NICE CG97: Lower urinary tract symptoms in men: management — Treating urinary retention (2010; page checked August 2026) — https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg97/chapter/recommendations NICE CG97: Lower urinary tract symptoms in men: management — Treating urinary retention (2010; page checked August 2026) — https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg97/chapter/recommendations