Benign prostatic enlargement treated with finasteride — MSRA MCQ
Instant feedback + full explanation. One question, done properly.
Educational content. Not a substitute for clinical judgement or local policy.
Reveal the answer and explanation
Correct answer: E — Arrange a suspected cancer pathway referral for prostate cancer while continuing current treatment
Explanation lettering: B = shown as A · D = shown as B · A = shown as D
After at least 6 months of finasteride, the measured PSA should be doubled when comparing it with reference ranges for untreated men. His PSA of 2.4 micrograms/L therefore equates to approximately 4.8 micrograms/L. In a symptomatic man aged 60–69 years, this exceeds the NICE age-specific PSA threshold of 4.5 micrograms/L at which a suspected cancer pathway referral should be considered. His preference to investigate and absence of major competing comorbidity support referral. A is unsafe because the apparent PSA reduction is misleading: 2.4 micrograms/L is not reassuring without adjustment for finasteride. B is inappropriate because stopping finasteride delays assessment and is not required to interpret PSA after 6 months of treatment. C would be reasonable only if there were evidence suggesting UTI or prostatitis as a transient cause of PSA elevation; none is present. D under-prioritises the possibility of prostate cancer once the appropriately adjusted PSA exceeds the relevant threshold. Finasteride can be continued while referral proceeds; a sustained PSA rise during finasteride treatment also warrants evaluation.
Reference: Finasteride 5 mg film-coated tablets - Summary of Product Characteristics (Published 2025) — https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc/product/13543/smpc Suspected cancer: recognition and referral (NG12), recommendations organised by site of cancer (Last updated 15 April 2026) — https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng12/chapter/Recommendations-organised-by-site-of-cancer