Suspected clinically localised prostate cancer in a man taking finasteride — MSRA MCQ
Instant feedback + full explanation. One question, done properly.
Educational content. Not a substitute for clinical judgement or local policy.
Reveal the answer and explanation
Correct answer: C — Offer a systematic prostate biopsy
Explanation lettering: C = shown as A · D = shown as B · A = shown as C · B = shown as D
Finasteride reduces PSA by approximately 50% after 6 months or more; therefore this PSA of 3.1 micrograms/L should be interpreted as approximately 6.2 micrograms/L in an untreated man. His adjusted PSA density is therefore about 0.17 ng/mL/mL (6.2/36), exceeding the NICE example threshold of 0.15 for strong suspicion of prostate cancer. The sustained PSA rise from the finasteride-associated nadir further supports concern. Although a Likert 1 or 2 MRI permits biopsy omission in some people, NICE recommends offering biopsy where suspicion remains strong, including PSA density above 0.15, after considering fitness and preferences. As there is no MRI lesion to target, the appropriate biopsy is systematic (typically performed by a local transperineal or transrectal pathway). B and C would be appropriate where MRI is low risk and PSA density/kinetics indicate low suspicion. D is unsuitable because MRI-targeted biopsy is indicated for Likert 3 or greater lesions. E is not appropriate for initial assessment outside a clinical trial.
Reference: NICE NG131: Prostate cancer: diagnosis and management — MRI and biopsy; if the MRI or biopsy is negative (2019; current NICE page checked August 2026) — https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng131/chapter/Recommendations Finasteride 5 mg film-coated tablets — Summary of Product Characteristics (Updated 2025) — https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc/product/13543/smpc