Chronic urinary retention secondary to benign prostatic enlargement — MSRA MCQ
Instant feedback + full explanation. One question, done properly.
Educational content. Not a substitute for clinical judgement or local policy.
Reveal the answer and explanation
Correct answer: C — Offer bladder-outlet surgery without prior catheterisation
Explanation lettering: E = shown as C · C = shown as D · D = shown as E
This man has chronic urinary retention with severe, bothersome voiding symptoms despite appropriate medical treatment. The key discriminator is that he has neither renal impairment nor upper-tract abnormality: renal function is preserved and ultrasound shows no hydronephrosis. NICE therefore advises that bladder-outlet surgery may be offered without prior catheterisation in men with chronic retention, bothersome LUTS and no renal or upper-tract impairment. A is appropriate for non-bothersome chronic retention when the bladder has not been drained, not for severe symptoms refractory to drug treatment. B is unnecessarily invasive in this case: catheterisation is required when chronic retention has caused renal impairment or hydronephrosis, neither of which is present. C is a reasonable alternative where markedly impaired bladder function is suspected, but the stem supports outlet obstruction and provides no evidence of detrusor failure. D reflects the acute urinary retention pathway, in which catheterisation and alpha-blockade precede catheter removal; this is chronic retention rather than acute painful retention. Therefore, definitive outlet surgery without preceding bladder drainage is the best plan.
Reference: Lower urinary tract symptoms in men: management — recommendations, section 1.7 Treating urinary retention (Last updated 3 June 2015) — https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg97/chapter/recommendations