Possible bladder cancer — MSRA MCQ
Instant feedback + full explanation. One question, done properly.
Educational content. Not a substitute for clinical judgement or local policy.
Reveal the answer and explanation
Correct answer: B — Refer using a suspected cancer pathway for bladder cancer
This patient meets the NICE NG12 criterion for suspected bladder cancer referral: she is aged 60 years or over and has unexplained non-visible haematuria with a raised white cell count. Her urine culture is negative and there is no clinical focus of infection, so the haematuria and neutrophilia remain unexplained. A suspected cancer pathway referral should therefore be made without delaying for serial testing or primary-care imaging. Repeating urinalysis and the full blood count may be reasonable for isolated low-risk abnormalities that do not meet a referral threshold, but it is inappropriate here because the threshold is already met. Renal tract ultrasound is not a substitute for referral and could delay specialist investigation, which may include cystoscopy and appropriate upper-tract imaging. Nephrology referral would be more appropriate where haematuria is accompanied by features suggesting kidney disease, such as significant albuminuria, declining eGFR, hypertension or an active urinary sediment; these are absent. Empirical antibiotic treatment is not indicated because she has no urinary symptoms, pyuria, nitrites or culture-confirmed infection.
Reference: Suspected cancer: recognition and referral (NG12), Bladder cancer, recommendation 1.6.4 (2015; updated 2026) — https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng12/chapter/recommendations-organised-by-site-of-cancer