Suspected imported malaria — MSRA MCQ
Instant feedback + full explanation. One question, done properly.
Educational content. Not a substitute for clinical judgement or local policy.
Reveal the answer and explanation
Correct answer: B — Arrange immediate emergency-department assessment for urgent malaria testing, including blood film microscopy, and communicate suspected malaria to the receiving team
This patient requires immediate assessment for suspected malaria. She has an acute febrile illness within 3 months of return from tropical Africa, where falciparum malaria is a key concern. UK guidance states that fever after return from the tropics should be considered malaria until proven otherwise, that suspected malaria is a medical emergency, and that diagnostic blood films should be obtained urgently. Falciparum malaria can deteriorate over hours; microscopy cannot be deferred until a fever spike or routine laboratory session. Adherence to atovaquone/proguanil reduces risk but does not exclude malaria, so option A is unsafe. Option D introduces an unacceptable delay. Option E may identify thrombocytopenia or hepatic involvement but does not replace urgent parasitological diagnosis and should not delay referral. Option C is inappropriate because malaria cannot be diagnosed clinically with certainty, treatment depends on species and severity, and community empirical treatment could delay definitive assessment. The absence of hypotension, impaired consciousness or respiratory compromise means ambulance transfer is not specified by the stem, but she should be sent directly for same-day emergency assessment rather than managed in routine primary care.
Reference: Malaria prevention guidelines for travellers from the UK 2026: Diagnosis (Updated 16 July 2026) — https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/malaria-prevention-guidelines-for-travellers-from-the-uk-2026/diagnosis Malaria: migrant health guide (2014) — https://www.gov.uk/guidance/malaria-migrant-health-guide