Suspected clinically localised prostate cancer with low-risk MRI — MSRA MCQ
Instant feedback + full explanation. One question, done properly.
Educational content. Not a substitute for clinical judgement or local policy.
Reveal the answer and explanation
Correct answer: A — Offer a systematic prostate biopsy following shared decision-making
Explanation lettering: D = shown as B · B = shown as C · C = shown as D
The appropriate next step is to offer systematic prostate biopsy. Although the MRI is low risk (Likert 2; also reported as PI-RADS 2), NICE advises repeating PSA after 3 to 6 months in biopsy-naive men with Likert 1 or 2 MRI, then offering biopsy where suspicion remains strong. This repeat PSA has already been performed. His PSA density is 6.7/41 = 0.163 ng/mL/mL, which exceeds the NICE threshold of 0.15 ng/mL/mL. This constitutes strong suspicion despite a low-risk MRI and benign DRE. The modest PSA change does not provide a PSA-velocity trigger, but that is immaterial because the PSA-density criterion is independently sufficient. As there is no MRI target warranting lesion-directed sampling, a systematic biopsy is the appropriate biopsy approach. B would be appropriate only if overall suspicion were low, including PSA density not exceeding 0.15 ng/mL/mL. C is attractive because combined targeted and systematic sampling is used for MRI-visible suspicious lesions, but this MRI has no lesion requiring targeting. D repeats a step already completed at the recommended interval. E risks delaying diagnosis despite a current biochemical trigger for biopsy.
Reference: NICE NG131: Prostate cancer: diagnosis and management — Recommendations (2019) — https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng131/chapter/Recommendations NICE NG131 evidence review E: Managing people at increased risk of prostate cancer (2026) — https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng131/evidence/e-following-up-people-at-increased-risk-of-prostate-cancer-pdf-6779081778