Suspected clinically localised prostate cancer with low-risk MRI but high PSA density — MSRA MCQ
Instant feedback + full explanation. One question, done properly.
Educational content. Not a substitute for clinical judgement or local policy.
Reveal the answer and explanation
Correct answer: D — Offer a systematic prostate biopsy after discussion of risks and benefits
Explanation lettering: E = shown as A · D = shown as B · B = shown as C · A = shown as D · C = shown as E
The PSA density is 7.2/35 = 0.21 nanogram/mL/mL, which exceeds the NICE example threshold of 0.15 nanogram/mL/mL indicating strong suspicion of clinically significant prostate cancer. Although a Likert 1 or 2 MRI may allow biopsy to be omitted, this is appropriate only when the overall level of suspicion is low. In a fit person with substantial life expectancy and raised PSA density, NICE recommends offering prostate biopsy. Where biopsy is undertaken after a low-risk MRI, this should be a systematic biopsy. B and C would be appropriate approaches for a person with Likert 1 or 2 MRI findings and low overall suspicion, for example PSA density below 0.15 nanogram/mL/mL without concerning PSA kinetics or family history. D is appropriate for MRI Likert scores of 3 or more, where MRI identifies a lesion requiring targeted sampling. E is inappropriate because NICE advises against mapping transperineal template biopsy as part of initial assessment outside a clinical trial.
Reference: NICE NG131: Prostate cancer: diagnosis and management — MRI and biopsy (2019; current recommendations page checked 15 August 2026) — https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng131/chapter/recommendations