Atrial fibrillation in older adult — CCFP MCQ
Instant feedback + full explanation. One question, done properly.
Educational content. Not a substitute for clinical judgement or local policy.
Reveal the answer and explanation
Correct answer: B — Discuss initiating oral anticoagulation, explaining that stroke-prevention benefit usually outweighs fall-related bleeding risk in her case
This patient has very high stroke risk (CHA₂DS₂-VASc ≥5: age, hypertension, prior TIA). Option B is correct because it mandates discussion of anticoagulation with explicit acknowledgement of her fall concern, while conveying the evidence-based conclusion that stroke prevention benefit usually outweighs fall-related bleeding risk. Option E reverses the evidence. Option D (dual antiplatelets) is inferior to anticoagulation for AF and not guideline-recommended. Option C (age alone disqualifies) contradicts Canadian and international guidance, which emphasize stroke risk stratification over age cutoffs. Option A (CT screening) is unnecessary in the absence of acute symptoms or trauma.
Reference: Thrombosis Canada. Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation. https://thrombosiscanada.ca/clinical_guides/pdfs/STROKEPREVENTIONINATRIALFIBRIL_61.pdf (endorsed by Canadian guidelines on antithrombotic therapy); supported by Garwood & Corbett (Am J Geriatr Care. 2008) and contemporary evidence on anticoagulation in elderly patients with fall risk.