skip to main content

High-risk non-ST-elevation ACS — RCPSC EM MCQ

Instant feedback + full explanation. One question, done properly.

HardCardiovascular emergenciesHigh-risk non-ST-elevation ACSRCPSC EM

A patient with confirmed PE and no fibrinolysis contraindication develops BP 76/44 mmHg, persistent altered mentation and lactate 5 mmol/L despite fluids and norepinephrine. CT shows RV strain. What is the appropriate reperfusion plan?

Educational content. Not a substitute for clinical judgement or local policy.

Reveal the answer and explanation

Correct answer: DAdminister systemic thrombolysis while continuing resuscitation and anticoagulation management

Explanation lettering: E = shown as A · A = shown as B · B = shown as C · C = shown as E

D is correct for high-risk PE with persistent shock when there is no fibrinolysis contraindication. E is insufficient for haemodynamic collapse. A delays rescue reperfusion. B is inappropriate during instability. C removes essential treatment without benefit.

Reference: Thrombosis Canada, Pulmonary Embolism: High- and Intermediate-Risk: https://thrombosiscanada.ca/hcp/practice/clinical_guides?guideID=132&language=en-ca