Sodium hypochlorite extrusion injury — ORE Part 1 MCQ
Instant feedback + full explanation. One question, done properly.
Educational content. Not a substitute for clinical judgement or local policy.
Reveal the answer and explanation
Correct answer: E — Sodium hypochlorite extrusion injury
Explanation lettering: B = shown as A · D = shown as B · E = shown as D · A = shown as E
The diagnosis is sodium hypochlorite extrusion injury (A). The key clinical discriminators are: (1) immediate onset during active irrigation (not delayed); (2) sudden severe pain—characteristic of chemical tissue injury rather than inflammatory response; (3) rapid facial swelling and bruising extending to canine fossa—indicating extravasation into soft tissue planes; and (4) precipitating factor: pressurised delivery through a wedged needle. Sodium hypochlorite, when extruded beyond the apical foramen or through root perforations, causes acute chemical injury characterised by rapid edema, haematoma, and bruising. Option B (local anaesthetic allergy) would present with urticarial or anaphylactic features and would require prior sensitisation; allergy does not cause acute chemical necrosis. Option C (acute periapical granuloma) develops over weeks to months, not during treatment. Option D is excluded by the patient's negative latex history. Option E (alveolar osteitis) occurs post-extraction, typically 2–3 days after treatment, not intraoperatively. The combination of mechanism (pressurised irrigation), timing (immediate), and clinical presentation (acute chemical injury with rapid swelling/bruising) is pathognomonic for NaOCl extrusion.
Reference: Farook SA, Shah V, Lenouvel D, et al. Guidelines for management of sodium hypochlorite extrusion injuries. Br Dent J. 2014; 217(12): 679–684. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25525012/