skip to main content

Suicide risk in rural practice — CCFP MCQ

Instant feedback + full explanation. One question, done properly.

HardEthics, professionalism, Indigenous health, rural medicineSuicide risk in rural practiceCCFP

A 38-year-old rural patient presents with worsening depression, escalating alcohol use, and recent separation. He keeps firearms at home but denies a current suicide plan. The nearest emergency department is 90 minutes away. A trusted cousin is present during the consultation. What is the most appropriate next step in management?

Educational content. Not a substitute for clinical judgement or local policy.

Reveal the answer and explanation

Correct answer: A — Develop a safety plan including firearm restriction, engage his cousin as support, and arrange urgent mental health or emergency assessment as indicated

Explanation lettering: D = shown as A · C = shown as B · E = shown as C · A = shown as D · B = shown as E

D is correct. Canadian guidelines emphasize immediate safety planning for suicide risk, which in this case includes lethal means (firearm) restriction and engaging the available support (cousin). Timely referral to mental health or emergency services is warranted due to active risk factors in a rural context. Option A is inappropriate: waiting until suicidal thoughts worsen delays necessary intervention. B introduces additional risk by prescribing sedatives, especially with alcohol use. C is wrong: confidentiality can be breached in the presence of significant risk. E delays assessment and does not mitigate risk. Evidence-based protocols require coordinated safety planning, support engagement, and urgent assessment.

Reference: CADTH. Lethal Means Counselling for Suicide Prevention: Clinical Effectiveness and Guidelines. 2024. https://www.cadth.ca/lethal-means-counselling-suicide-prevention-clinical-effectiveness-and-guidelines