Antipsychotic metabolic effects — MRCPsych Paper A MCQ
Instant feedback + full explanation. One question, done properly.
Educational content. Not a substitute for clinical judgement or local policy.
Reveal the answer and explanation
Correct answer: C — It has lower liability for weight gain, dyslipidaemia and dysglycaemia
Explanation lettering: E = shown as A · D = shown as C · C = shown as D · A = shown as E
D is correct. Olanzapine has a high liability for clinically significant weight gain and adverse changes in glucose and lipid parameters, whereas lurasidone has a substantially more favourable average metabolic profile. This makes lurasidone a rational alternative when diabetes control and weight have deteriorated, although metabolic monitoring must continue because its risk is not zero. Strong H1 antagonism generally promotes sedation, appetite and weight gain rather than reducing them. Muscarinic M3 antagonism can impair, not enhance, insulin secretion. Lurasidone neither induces nor depends on CYP1A2; it is primarily metabolised by CYP3A4. It is also not predominantly excreted unchanged by the kidneys, and renal elimination would not in itself prevent receptor-mediated metabolic adverse effects.
Reference: electronic Medicines Compendium. Lurasidone 18.5 mg film-coated tablets, SmPC sections 4.4, 5.1 and 5.2, revised 2026; and ZYPREXA coated tablets, SmPC sections 4.4 and 4.8, revised 2026. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc/product/100737/smpc ; https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc/product/15470/smpc