skip to main content

Publication bias — MRCPsych Paper A MCQ

Instant feedback + full explanation. One question, done properly.

ModerateEpidemiology and research methodsPublication biasMRCPsych Paper A

A meta-analysis of antidepressant trials produces an asymmetric funnel plot, with small studies reporting non-significant or unfavourable results apparently absent. A search of trial registries identifies several completed small trials with such results that have not been published. Which threat to the validity of the meta-analysis best explains this finding?

Educational content. Not a substitute for clinical judgement or local policy.

Reveal the answer and explanation

Correct answer: DPublication bias

The correct answer is **B, publication bias**. The key discriminator is that completed small trials with non-significant or unfavourable findings were not published, leaving published small positive studies over-represented and producing funnel-plot asymmetry. Funnel asymmetry alone is not proof of publication bias because clinical or methodological heterogeneity can also produce small-study effects; the trial-registry findings make publication bias the best explanation here. Selective outcome reporting involves omission or selective presentation of outcomes within a published study rather than non-publication of entire trials. Language bias results from restricting inclusion by publication language, while citation bias occurs when studies with favourable findings are more likely to be cited and therefore located. Clinical heterogeneity could cause genuine differences in effects between smaller and larger trials but does not account for confirmed non-publication.

Reference: Guyatt G, Wang Y, Eachempati P, et al. Core GRADE 4: rating certainty of evidence—risk of bias, publication bias, and reasons for rating up certainty. BMJ. 2025;389:e083864. https://www.bmj.com/content/389/bmj-2024-083864