skip to main content

MAID Track 2 safeguards — MCCQE Part 1 MCQ

Instant feedback + full explanation. One question, done properly.

HardEthics & ProfessionalismMAID Track 2 safeguardsMCCQE Part 1

48-year-old woman with severe refractory neurologic disease presents with requesting MAID. Her natural death is not reasonably foreseeable but she appears capable and informed. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step?

Educational content. Not a substitute for clinical judgement or local policy.

Reveal the answer and explanation

Correct answer: DApply Track 2 safeguards including expertise/consultation and longer assessment requirements

Apply Track 2 safeguards including expertise/consultation and longer assessment requirements is best because Track 2 has additional safeguards when natural death is not reasonably foreseeable. Breach confidentiality broadly without legal basis is suboptimal because disclosure must be limited to what is legally authorised or clinically necessary; Let family preference override a capable patient is suboptimal because capable patients direct their own care; Refuse to discuss the issue and document nothing is suboptimal because professional practice requires communication and clear documentation; Delay a mandatory report until certainty is absolute is suboptimal because statutory reporting thresholds are often suspicion or reasonable belief, not proof. Mental illness as sole underlying condition remains treated separately under federal law.

Reference: Justice Canada MAID law; Health Canada MAID reporting