skip to main content

Articaine Bone Penetration — NDEB AFK MCQ

Instant feedback + full explanation. One question, done properly.

ModeratePain & Anxiety ControlArticaine Bone PenetrationNDEB AFK

Which of the following is an advantage of articaine 4% over lidocaine 2% for maxillary buccal infiltration?

Educational content. Not a substitute for clinical judgement or local policy.

Reveal the answer and explanation

Correct answer: ASuperior bone penetration allowing reliable buccal infiltration anaesthesia of mandibular molars in adults

Articaine 4% with 1:100,000 epinephrine has superior bone penetration compared to lidocaine 2% due to its higher concentration, increased lipid solubility, and the presence of a thiophene ring (enhancing tissue diffusion). This allows reliable buccal infiltration anaesthesia of mandibular posterior teeth in adults — potentially avoiding the IAN block. Multiple studies demonstrate that articaine buccal infiltration provides comparable anaesthesia to IAN block for mandibular molar procedures.

Reference: Malamed – Handbook of Local Anesthesia, 7th ed., 2020