Section 17 Seven-Day Rule — MRCPsych Paper B MCQ
Instant feedback + full explanation. One question, done properly.
Educational content. Not a substitute for clinical judgement or local policy.
Reveal the answer and explanation
Correct answer: D — Whether the patient should instead be discharged onto a community treatment order
Explanation lettering: D = shown as A · A = shown as B · B = shown as D
B is correct. Section 17(2A) requires that, where leave is granted for more than seven consecutive days — or where an extension makes the total unbroken period exceed seven days, as here (nine days) — the responsible clinician must first consider whether the patient should instead be dealt with under section 17A, i.e. discharged onto a community treatment order. A CTO need not follow: longer-term leave remains lawful if more suitable, but both options must be weighed and the reasoning recorded. A is wrong: renewal of section 3 follows its own statutory timetable and is unrelated to leave duration. C is wrong: guardianship is a separate provision and no prerequisite to leave. D is wrong: no nearest-relative consent is required. E is wrong: section 17 leave is granted by the responsible clinician, not authorised by hospital managers. The duty does not apply to restricted patients, hence the stem specifies an unrestricted section 3 patient.
Reference: Mental Health Act 1983, section 17(2A)–(2B) (Leave of absence from hospital), as amended by the Mental Health Act 2007; see also Mental Health Act 1983: Code of Practice (England, 2015), chapter 27. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1983/20/section/17