skip to main content

Antidepressant Comparative Efficacy — MRCPsych Paper B MCQ

Instant feedback + full explanation. One question, done properly.

HardMood DisordersAntidepressant Comparative EfficacyMRCPsych Paper B

In the Cipriani et al. 2018 network meta-analysis of antidepressants for the acute treatment of adults with unipolar major depressive disorder, which grouping most accurately reflects the comparative efficacy findings from the head-to-head analyses?

Educational content. Not a substitute for clinical judgement or local policy.

Reveal the answer and explanation

Correct answer: CAgomelatine, amitriptyline, escitalopram, mirtazapine, paroxetine, venlafaxine and vortioxetine were in the more-effective group; fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, reboxetine and trazodone were least efficacious

Explanation lettering: C = shown as A · D = shown as B · B = shown as C · A = shown as D

Option B reproduces the head-to-head efficacy findings. Agomelatine, amitriptyline, escitalopram, mirtazapine, paroxetine, venlafaxine and vortioxetine were more effective than other antidepressants, whereas fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, reboxetine and trazodone comprised the least-efficacious group. All 21 antidepressants were nevertheless more effective than placebo. Options A and C incorrectly substitute citalopram or sertraline and misclassify fluvoxamine or paroxetine. Option D largely confuses efficacy with acceptability: citalopram, fluoxetine and sertraline had comparatively favourable acceptability, while amitriptyline, duloxetine and venlafaxine had higher dropout rates. Option E incorrectly substitutes duloxetine for amitriptyline. These rankings describe average trial outcomes and should not alone determine treatment for an individual patient.

Reference: Cipriani A et al. Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 21 antidepressant drugs for the acute treatment of adults with major depressive disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. The Lancet. 2018;391:1357-1366. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29477251/