Amisulpride Augmentation — MRCPsych Paper B MCQ
Instant feedback + full explanation. One question, done properly.
Educational content. Not a substitute for clinical judgement or local policy.
Reveal the answer and explanation
Correct answer: C — Evidence of efficacy is limited; if used, amisulpride should be a time-limited, closely monitored individual trial
Explanation lettering: C = shown as A · E = shown as B · B = shown as C · A = shown as D · D = shown as E
B is correct. NICE allows consideration of a second antipsychotic only after clozapine has been optimised and reversible causes of apparent non-response have been addressed. It does not recommend amisulpride specifically. In the UK AMICUS placebo-controlled trial, amisulpride did not produce a statistically significant improvement in the primary response outcome and caused a greater adverse-effect burden, including cardiac effects. Therefore, its use should be an explicitly documented, time-limited trial with assessment of target symptoms, adverse effects and ECG-related risk. A overstates efficacy and understates monitoring. C incorrectly attributes a drug-specific recommendation to NICE. D confuses persistent psychosis with an indication for antidepressant treatment. E is wrong because a therapeutic concentration supports adequate exposure but does not itself exclude non-adherence patterns, comorbidity, substance misuse or other causes of pseudo-resistance.
Reference: Barnes TRE et al. Amisulpride augmentation in clozapine-unresponsive schizophrenia (AMICUS): a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial of clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. Health Technology Assessment. 2017;21(49). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28869006/