Feeding under MHA — MRCPsych Paper B MCQ
Instant feedback + full explanation. One question, done properly.
Educational content. Not a substitute for clinical judgement or local policy.
Reveal the answer and explanation
Correct answer: D — Section 63 can authorise nasogastric feeding as treatment for anorexia nervosa despite her refusal.
Explanation lettering: D = shown as A · A = shown as B · B = shown as D
B is correct. Nasogastric feeding aimed at reversing starvation caused by anorexia nervosa is treatment for the mental disorder. For a patient detained under section 3, section 63 permits such treatment without consent when it is given by or under the direction of the approved clinician in charge. A capacitous refusal must be taken seriously but does not provide an absolute veto over section 63 treatment. The Court of Protection is not required merely because the patient refuses, and loss of capacity is not a prerequisite. A nearest relative has no power to consent to treatment on the adult patient's behalf. Compulsion is not automatic: clinical necessity, proportionality, the least restrictive approach, competent multidisciplinary delivery and careful review remain essential.
Reference: Royal College of Psychiatrists, Medical Emergencies in Eating Disorders: Guidance on Recognition and Management (CR233), section 5(d) and Appendix 2, 2022: https://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/docs/default-source/improving-care/better-mh-policy/college-reports/college-report-cr233-medical-emergencies-in-eating-disorders-%28meed%29-guidance.pdf?sfvrsn=2d327483_59