CTO Recall Criteria — MRCPsych Paper B MCQ
Instant feedback + full explanation. One question, done properly.
Educational content. Not a substitute for clinical judgement or local policy.
Reveal the answer and explanation
Correct answer: D — He requires medical treatment in hospital for mental disorder and there would be a risk of harm to his health or safety, or to other persons, if he were not recalled
Explanation lettering: D = shown as A · E = shown as B · A = shown as C · B = shown as D · C = shown as E
B is correct. On the clinical ground in section 17E(1), the responsible clinician must consider both that the patient requires medical treatment in hospital for mental disorder and that there would be a risk of harm to the patient's health or safety, or to others, if he were not recalled. A is the classic error: non-compliance with a condition may be taken into account, but the Act expressly states that recall is neither confined to nor triggered by breach alone — the clinical test must still be met, and here the man is not acutely unwell. E invents a non-existent 'two strikes' rule. C and D fail because recall is a power personal to the responsible clinician, exercised by written notice (Form CTO3); relatives and GPs have no such power, although their concerns may inform risk assessment. The separate ground of non-compliance with a mandatory condition to be available for examination is excluded by the stem.
Reference: Mental Health Act 1983, sections 17B(6)–(7) and 17E (power to recall a community patient to hospital), as inserted by the Mental Health Act 2007, Part 1 Chapter 4 — legislation.gov.uk. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2007/12/part/1/chapter/4