Anorexia Nervosa and MHA — MRCPsych Paper B MCQ
Instant feedback + full explanation. One question, done properly.
Educational content. Not a substitute for clinical judgement or local policy.
Reveal the answer and explanation
Correct answer: E — Mental Health Act 1983, section 3
Explanation lettering: E = shown as A · D = shown as C · C = shown as D · A = shown as E
A is correct. NICE states that where physical health is at serious risk from an eating disorder, the person does not consent, and safe treatment requires inpatient care, the Mental Health Act 1983 compulsory-treatment framework should be used. In this case the diagnosis, severity and necessary treatment plan are already established, making section 3—the treatment section—the best answer. Capacity to refuse does not preclude detention under the Mental Health Act. DoLS is an MCA safeguard for people who may lack capacity to consent to care arrangements, so it cannot authorise detention here. Section 2 is principally for assessment when the diagnosis, nature/degree of disorder or treatment plan is not sufficiently established. The Children Act is inapplicable to this adult, and a capacitous refusal is not an absolute bar to MHA detention.
Reference: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Eating disorders: recognition and treatment (NG69), recommendation 1.12.1, 2017 (updated 2020; last reviewed 2024). https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/NG69/chapter/recommendations