Opioid Dose Escalation Review — FRCA Final MCQ
Instant feedback + full explanation. One question, done properly.
Educational content. Not a substitute for clinical judgement or local policy.
Reveal the answer and explanation
Correct answer: D — Arrange a structured review of efficacy, function and harms, with specialist pain-service input
Explanation lettering: E = shown as B · D = shown as C · C = shown as D · B = shown as E
C is correct. Diminishing benefit after prolonged opioid treatment, without functional improvement or new remediable pathology, should prompt a structured, person-centred review rather than automatic escalation. This should reassess pain mechanisms, function, adverse effects, dependence, mood, opioid-induced hyperalgesia, non-pharmacological treatment and whether supported dose reduction is appropriate. Pregabalin 300 mg twice daily is already the licensed maximum dose and also requires benefit–harm review. Increasing oxycodone or adding fentanyl would increase opioid exposure and associated harms without addressing loss of efficacy. Opioid rotation may occasionally be specialist-led but is not an automatic substitute for review and requires cautious conversion. Oral ketamine is not a routine long-term adjunct for this presentation. Neither opioid nor pregabalin should be stopped abruptly.
Reference: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. NG215, Medicines associated with dependence or withdrawal symptoms: safe prescribing and withdrawal management for adults, sections 1.3–1.5. 2022. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng215/chapter/Recommendations