NEWS2 Escalation — FRCA Final MCQ
Instant feedback + full explanation. One question, done properly.
Educational content. Not a substitute for clinical judgement or local policy.
Reveal the answer and explanation
Correct answer: C — Arrange emergency assessment by a team with critical-care competencies, including advanced airway-management skills
Explanation lettering: B = shown as A · E = shown as B · A = shown as E
An aggregate NEWS2 score of 7 or more is the RCP high-risk, emergency-response threshold. It mandates continuous monitoring of vital signs, immediate notification of the responsible medical team, and emergency assessment by a team with critical-care competencies, including advanced airway-management skills, with consideration of transfer to a level 2 or 3 care area. Option C is therefore correct. Option B describes the urgent response reserved for an aggregate score of 5–6 (or a red score of 3 in a single parameter); it is insufficient once the aggregate reaches 7. Four-hourly observations (A) suit low scores (1–4); routine observations (D) suit a score of 0. Informing the nurse in charge and rechecking in an hour (E) would dangerously delay definitive escalation. Note that a score of 3 in one parameter triggers urgent review, not the emergency response.
Reference: NICE. Medtech innovation briefing MIB205: National Early Warning Score systems that alert to deteriorating adult patients in hospital – The technology (NEWS2 trigger thresholds: high risk, aggregate score ≥7, emergency assessment by critical care team). 2020. https://www.nice.org.uk/advice/mib205/chapter/The-technology