ARDS Prone Positioning — FRCA Final MCQ
Instant feedback + full explanation. One question, done properly.
Educational content. Not a substitute for clinical judgement or local policy.
Reveal the answer and explanation
Correct answer: A — Prone positioning for at least 16 hours per session
Explanation lettering: B = shown as A · A = shown as B · D = shown as C · E = shown as D · C = shown as E
B is correct. This patient has early, severe ARDS despite optimised lung-protective ventilation and meets the PROSEVA physiological criteria. PROSEVA used prone sessions lasting at least 16 hours and reduced 28-day mortality from 32.8% to 16.0%, an absolute reduction of 16.8% and an NNT of approximately 6. Proning improves ventilation homogeneity and reduces regional overdistension, cyclic atelectasis and ventilator-induced lung injury. Inhaled nitric oxide may transiently improve oxygenation but has no established mortality benefit. High-frequency oscillatory ventilation is not recommended because trials found no benefit and possible harm. VV-ECMO is a rescue strategy for selected refractory cases, usually after proning. Recruitment manoeuvres with incremental PEEP do not have comparable mortality evidence and may cause haemodynamic compromise or barotrauma.
Reference: Griffiths MJD et al. Guidelines on the management of acute respiratory distress syndrome, section: Prone positioning. BMJ Open Respiratory Research. 2019;6:e000420. https://bmjopenrespres.bmj.com/content/6/1/e000420