Kennedy Class IV Design Challenge — ORE Part 1 MCQ
Instant feedback + full explanation. One question, done properly.
Educational content. Not a substitute for clinical judgement or local policy.
Reveal the answer and explanation
Correct answer: A — Providing retention without conspicuous anterior metalwork
Explanation lettering: E = shown as B · B = shown as D · D = shown as E
A is correct. In a Kennedy Class IV arch, the saddle is anterior and crosses the midline; components placed on anterior teeth are likely to be visible. The design challenge is therefore to obtain adequate retention, support and bracing while minimising visible clasping or metalwork and preserving appearance. Esthetic RPD literature specifically highlights Kennedy Class IV as an esthetically challenging situation and describes alternative paths of insertion to reduce visible retentive components. B is an important general requirement for all cobalt-chromium RPDs, but is not the defining Class IV issue. C is incorrect because palatal coverage may be required for support and rigidity. D is contrary to sound framework design. E relates to posterior extension and is not inherent to an anterior Class IV saddle.
Reference: Davenport JC, et al. An overview of esthetics with removable partial dentures. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 2003. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12553618/