Root-Treated Molar Restoration — ORE Part 1 MCQ
Instant feedback + full explanation. One question, done properly.
Educational content. Not a substitute for clinical judgement or local policy.
Reveal the answer and explanation
Correct answer: C — Indirect cuspal coverage restoration (onlay or crown)
Explanation lettering: D = shown as A · C = shown as B · A = shown as C · B = shown as D
The answer is A: Indirect cuspal coverage restoration (onlay or crown). With 60% of coronal structure missing, this tooth exceeds the threshold for direct composite restoration alone. Randomised controlled trials demonstrate that metal-ceramic crowns and indirect restorations have better success rates and lower need for re-intervention than direct composite in teeth with extensive coronal damage. The absence of a post means an endocrown (bonded full-coverage ceramic restoration seated on the internal pulp chamber walls and cavity margins) or a crown with a composite core buildup are both appropriate options—both provide cuspal coverage. Options B (composite), C (pins), D (sealant) and E (no restoration) fail to address the structural deficit. Direct composite cannot provide adequate retention and resistance form for this extent of loss; pins are biomechanically inadequate and outdated; sealants do not restore structure; and leaving a failed tooth untreated risks further deterioration.
Reference: Mannocci F, Semiglia A, De Sanctis M, Lorenzi C, Marrocchi V, Setti R, et al. Crown vs. composite for post-retained restorations: a randomized clinical trial. J Dent Res. 2016;95(5):500–506. doi:10.1177/0022034515622126. See also: Qvist V, et al. Single crowns versus conventional fillings for the restoration of root-filled teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015(12):CD009956. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26403154/