skip to main content

Toxoplasma Prophylaxis Timing — SCE Infectious Diseases MCQ

Instant feedback + full explanation. One question, done properly.

ModerateHIV MedicineToxoplasma Prophylaxis TimingSCE Infectious Diseases

A 30-year-old man with HIV (CD4 300, VL <50 on DTG/TAF/FTC) is found to have positive Toxoplasma IgG on routine screening. He has no neurological symptoms. What prophylaxis is indicated?

Educational content. Not a substitute for clinical judgement or local policy.

Reveal the answer and explanation

Correct answer: CNo prophylaxis at this CD4 — only needed below CD4 200

Toxoplasma IgG positivity in a person with HIV indicates previous exposure/latent infection, not active toxoplasmosis. In an asymptomatic patient with CD4 300 cells/mm³ and fully suppressed viral load on ART, primary anti-Toxoplasma prophylaxis is not indicated. UK practice/exam teaching is that prophylaxis is reserved for substantially immunosuppressed Toxoplasma-seropositive patients, classically when CD4 falls below 200 cells/mm³; co-trimoxazole is then used because it also provides Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia prophylaxis. A CD4 threshold of <350 is not an indication, and pyrimethamine alone, dapsone alone or atovaquone-only are not appropriate here. Therefore the correct answer is no prophylaxis at this CD4 count.

Reference: British HIV Association (BHIVA) and British Infection Association. Guidelines for the treatment of opportunistic infection in HIV-seropositive individuals 2011, section 2.5 Toxoplasma gondii/prophylaxis. https://bhiva.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/-file-SwhaEzgXmAGOt-hiv_v12_is2_Iss2Press_Text.pdf